Screener
CZA vs KAUG
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- CZA costs 0.10% less per year.
- CZA is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CZA follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- CZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $75M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +15.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 8.03% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -15.66% |
Similar to CZA and KAUG
Explore further