Screener
CZA vs PSCF
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.40% less per year.
- CZA is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | PSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $24M |
| Since | 2007 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +3.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 17.54% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -45.46% |
Similar to CZA and PSCF
Explore further