Screener
CZA vs RFV
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.34% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $318M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +9.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 18.07% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -52.24% |
Similar to CZA and RFV
Explore further