Screener
CZA vs XSLV
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- XSLV costs 0.44% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, CZA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | XSLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $234M |
| Since | 2007 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 2.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +13.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 13.30% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -44.34% |
Similar to CZA and XSLV
Explore further