Screener
CZAR vs CGGE
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Capital Group Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGGE is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZAR covers north america markets; CGGE covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | CGGE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 13.90% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -14.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and CGGE
Explore further