Screener
CZAR vs CGGR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZAR covers north america markets; CGGR covers global.
- CZAR follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $22.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and CGGR
Explore further