Screener
CZAR vs FNDC
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDC is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 3.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 14.29% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -43.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and FNDC
Explore further