Screener
CZAR vs SCHC
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHC costs 0.27% less per year.
- SCHC is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZAR covers north america markets; SCHC covers global ex us.
- SCHC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | SCHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $5.5B |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 3.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 15.52% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -43.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and SCHC
Explore further