Screener
CZAR vs GDX
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs VanEck Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.16% less per year.
- GDX is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | GDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $27.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +70.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +40.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 45.53% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -49.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and GDX
Explore further