Screener
CZAR vs GDXJ
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.17% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $8.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +78.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +45.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 49.67% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -57.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and GDXJ
Explore further