Screener
CZAR vs HRTS
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Tema Heart & Health ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.40% less per year.
- HRTS is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZAR covers north america markets; HRTS covers global.
- CZAR follows a index tracking strategy; HRTS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | HRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $50M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 15.98% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -25.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and HRTS
Explore further