Screener
CZAR vs INTL
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.49% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZAR is classified as equity, while INTL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CZAR covers north america markets; INTL covers global.
- CZAR follows a index tracking strategy; INTL uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $222M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 15.26% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and INTL
Explore further