Screener
CZAR vs TMAT
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.47% less per year.
- TMAT is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZAR is classified as equity, while TMAT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CZAR follows a index tracking strategy; TMAT uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.82% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $211M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +41.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 23.91% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -58.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and TMAT
Explore further