Screener
CZAR vs SCHX
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHX costs 0.32% less per year.
- SCHX is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | SCHX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $68.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 12.15% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -34.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and SCHX
Explore further