Screener
DBAW vs ACWX
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Key differences
- ACWX costs 0.08% less per year.
- ACWX is significantly larger than DBAW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DBAW covers global markets; ACWX covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, DBAW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $251M | $11.1B |
| Since | 2014 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.52% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.9% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.80% | 15.42% |
| Max drawdown | -31.44% | -35.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBAW and ACWX
Explore further