Screener
DBAW vs CWI
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF vs State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
Key differences
- CWI costs 0.10% less per year.
- CWI is significantly larger than DBAW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DBAW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CWI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBAW | CWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $251M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2014 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.52% | 2.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.9% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.80% | 15.25% |
| Max drawdown | -31.44% | -34.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBAW and CWI
Explore further