Screener
DBEF vs EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
Key differences
- EASG costs 0.21% less per year.
- DBEF is significantly larger than EASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DBEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DBEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBEF | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $67M |
| Since | 2011 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 5.21% | 3.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.2% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.53% | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -32.46% | -32.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBEF and EASG
Explore further