Screener
EASG vs EFA
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EASG costs 0.18% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than EASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EASG covers global markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EASG | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $67M | $75.6B |
| Since | 2018 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 3.96% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.1% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -32.06% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EASG and EFA
Explore further