Screener
DBEM vs EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
Key differences
- EMCS costs 0.51% less per year.
- EMCS is significantly larger than DBEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DBEM is classified as alternative, while EMCS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- DBEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBEM | EMCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $912M |
| Since | 2011 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 1.44% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.9% | +50.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.64% | 21.77% |
| Max drawdown | -33.50% | -44.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBEM and EMCS
Explore further