Screener
DBEZ vs XEML
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF vs Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF
Key differences
- XEML costs 0.10% less per year.
- DBEZ is significantly larger than XEML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DBEZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBEZ | XEML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $5M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.99% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.68% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.76% | -13.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBEZ and XEML
Explore further