Screener
XEML vs EZU
Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF vs iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
Key differences
- XEML costs 0.15% less per year.
- EZU is significantly larger than XEML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XEML | EZU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $9.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -13.49% | -41.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XEML and EZU
Explore further