Screener
DBJP vs FLJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLJP costs 0.36% less per year.
- FLJP is significantly larger than DBJP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DBJP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBJP | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $613M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.52% | 4.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.0% | +33.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.3% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.9% | +9.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.06% | 19.13% |
| Max drawdown | -31.30% | -32.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBJP and FLJP
Explore further