Screener
DBJP vs FLAX
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLAX costs 0.26% less per year.
- DBJP is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DBJP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBJP | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $613M | $47M |
| Since | 2011 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.52% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.0% | +48.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.3% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.9% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.06% | 18.62% |
| Max drawdown | -31.30% | -42.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBJP and FLAX
Explore further