Screener
DBJP vs KOKU
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
Key differences
Both DBJP and KOKU are equity ETFs. DBJP charges 0.45% a year and KOKU 0.09%. The main difference: DBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; KOKU covers global markets.
- DBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; KOKU covers global markets.
- KOKU costs 0.36% less per year.
- Over the last three years, DBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DBJP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBJP | KOKU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $660M | $805M |
| Since | 2011 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.36% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.8% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.7% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.9% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.03% | 12.49% |
| Max drawdown | -31.30% | -25.77% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.