Screener
KOKU vs EWJ
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
Both KOKU and EWJ are equity ETFs. KOKU charges 0.09% a year and EWJ 0.49%. The main difference: KOKU covers global markets; EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- KOKU covers global markets; EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- KOKU costs 0.40% less per year.
- EWJ is much larger than KOKU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, KOKU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KOKU | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $805M | $21.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.1% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.49% | 19.84% |
| Max drawdown | -25.77% | -33.14% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.