Screener
DCMT vs ISMF
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- DCMT costs 0.14% less per year.
- DCMT is classified as commodity, while ISMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- DCMT follows a active selection strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| DCMT | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $57M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.69% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.5% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.24% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -11.95% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DCMT and ISMF
Explore further