Screener
DEEF vs GLOF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF is significantly larger than DEEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DEEF follows a index enhanced strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DEEF | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $196M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.39% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.7% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.59% | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | -36.47% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DEEF and GLOF
Explore further