Screener
DEEF vs OMFS
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- DEEF costs 0.15% less per year.
- OMFS is significantly larger than DEEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DEEF covers global markets; OMFS covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, DEEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DEEF | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $275M |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.39% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.7% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.59% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -36.47% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DEEF and OMFS
Explore further