Screener
DEEF vs OMFL
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFL is significantly larger than DEEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DEEF is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- DEEF covers global markets; OMFL covers north america.
- DEEF follows a index enhanced strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, DEEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DEEF | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $4.6B |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.39% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.7% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.59% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -36.47% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DEEF and OMFL
Explore further