Screener
DEM vs EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
Key differences
- EMMF costs 0.15% less per year.
- DEM is significantly larger than EMMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DEM follows a index tracking strategy; EMMF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EMMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DEM | EMMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.7B | $167M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.05% | 2.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.28% | 16.07% |
| Max drawdown | -37.79% | -32.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DEM and EMMF
Explore further