Screener
DFAS vs EPSB
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- DFAS costs 0.62% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than EPSB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAS follows a active selection strategy; EPSB uses index tracking.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAS | EPSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.0B | $5M |
| Since | 1998 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +33.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.95% | 15.19% |
| Max drawdown | -26.13% | -8.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAS and EPSB
Explore further