Screener
DFAS vs GSLC
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 0.17% less per year.
- DFAS follows a active selection strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, GSLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAS | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.0B | $15.0B |
| Since | 1998 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.89% | 11.86% |
| Max drawdown | -26.13% | -33.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAS and GSLC
Explore further