Screener
DFAS vs GSSC
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.06% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than GSSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAS follows a active selection strategy; GSSC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GSSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAS | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.0B | $952M |
| Since | 1998 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.89% | 18.61% |
| Max drawdown | -26.13% | -41.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAS and GSSC
Explore further