Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

DFAT vs DCOR

Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF

DFAT

Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.28%

Fund size

$13.7B

DCOR

Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.14%

Fund size

$3.0B

Key differences

  • DCOR costs 0.14% less per year.
  • DFAT is significantly larger than DCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DFAT is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • DFAT follows a active selection strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
  • DFAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

DFATDCOR
Annual cost (TER)0.28%0.14%
Fund size (AUM)$13.7B$3.0B
Since19982023
Dividend yield1.45%0.95%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionmulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+31.8%+29.0%
CAGR 3Y+17.6%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.73N/A
Volatility 1Y16.98%11.99%
Max drawdown-26.12%-19.10%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to DFAT and DCOR