Screener
DFAT vs DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFAC costs 0.11% less per year.
- DFAC is significantly larger than DFAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAT | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.7B | $44.5B |
| Since | 1998 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.8% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.98% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -26.12% | -23.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAT and DFAC
Explore further