Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

DFAW vs DFAX

Dimensional World Equity ETF vs Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

DFAW

Dimensional World Equity ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.24%

Fund size

$1.3B

DFAX

Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.28%

Fund size

$11.5B

Key differences

  • DFAX is significantly larger than DFAW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DFAW follows a index tracking strategy; DFAX uses active selection.
  • DFAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

DFAWDFAX
Annual cost (TER)0.24%0.28%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B$11.5B
Since20232008
Dividend yield1.31%2.30%
Asset classequityequity
Region
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+30.8%+35.0%
CAGR 3YN/A+20.3%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.09
Volatility 1Y12.13%14.74%
Max drawdown-16.94%-28.15%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to DFAW and DFAX