Screener
DFAX vs DFAC
Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFAC costs 0.11% less per year.
- DFAC is significantly larger than DFAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAX | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.5B | $44.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.30% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.74% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -28.15% | -23.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAX and DFAC
Explore further