Screener
DFAX vs DCOR
Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF
Key differences
- DCOR costs 0.14% less per year.
- DFAX is significantly larger than DCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAX is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- DFAX follows a active selection strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
- DFAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAX | DCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.5B | $3.0B |
| Since | 2008 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.30% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.74% | 11.99% |
| Max drawdown | -28.15% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAX and DCOR
Explore further