Screener
DFAX vs DEXC
Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF vs Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- DFAX costs 0.15% less per year.
- DFAX is significantly larger than DEXC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAX follows a active selection strategy; DEXC uses index tracking.
- DFAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAX | DEXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.5B | $300M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.30% | 1.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +54.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.74% | 19.81% |
| Max drawdown | -28.15% | -15.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAX and DEXC
Explore further