Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

DFLV vs GSSC

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF

DFLV

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.21%

Fund size

$5.9B

GSSC

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF

Goldman Sachs

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$952M

Key differences

  • DFLV is significantly larger than GSSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DFLV follows a active selection strategy; GSSC uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, DFLV has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GSSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

DFLVGSSC
Annual cost (TER)0.21%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$5.9B$952M
Since20222017
Dividend yield1.46%1.10%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+32.4%+31.9%
CAGR 3Y+19.2%+17.5%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.4%
Sharpe 3Y1.080.72
Volatility 1Y11.35%18.61%
Max drawdown-16.80%-41.38%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to DFLV and GSSC