Screener
GSSC vs DFAS
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.06% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than GSSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSSC follows a index tracking strategy; DFAS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GSSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSSC | DFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $952M | $14.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.9% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.61% | 16.89% |
| Max drawdown | -41.38% | -26.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSSC and DFAS
Explore further