Screener
DGRO vs IWF
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.10% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than DGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DGRO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39.6B | $124.7B |
| Since | 2014 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.00% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.9% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.59% | 15.52% |
| Max drawdown | -35.10% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DGRO and IWF
Explore further