Screener
DGRO vs IWO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.16% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IWO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DGRO | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39.6B | $13.9B |
| Since | 2014 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.00% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.9% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.59% | 21.41% |
| Max drawdown | -35.10% | -42.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DGRO and IWO
Explore further