Screener
DIEM vs CGIC
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- DIEM costs 0.35% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than DIEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIEM follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
- DIEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIEM | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.6% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.01% | 15.05% |
| Max drawdown | -38.61% | -13.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIEM and CGIC
Explore further