Screener
DIVD vs EFAD
Altrius Global Dividend ETF vs ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- EFAD is significantly larger than DIVD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVD follows a active selection strategy; EFAD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVD | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $62M |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.70% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.6% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.41% | 13.36% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -35.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVD and EFAD
Explore further