Screener
DIVS vs GEND
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- GEND costs 0.07% less per year.
- DIVS is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVS is classified as equity, while GEND is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- DIVS covers global markets; GEND covers north america.
- DIVS follows a active selection strategy; GEND uses option income.
- DIVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | GEND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $4M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 10.70% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -6.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and GEND
Explore further