Screener
DIVS vs DIVB
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs iShares Core Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DIVB costs 0.40% less per year.
- DIVB is significantly larger than DIVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVS covers global markets; DIVB covers north america.
- DIVS follows a active selection strategy; DIVB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DIVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | DIVB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +12.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 11.34% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -36.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and DIVB
Explore further