Screener
DIVS vs IGRO
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- IGRO costs 0.30% less per year.
- IGRO is significantly larger than DIVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVS follows a active selection strategy; IGRO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | IGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -36.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and IGRO
Explore further