Screener
DIVS vs DGRO
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.37% less per year.
- DGRO is significantly larger than DIVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVS covers global markets; DGRO covers north america.
- DIVS follows a active selection strategy; DGRO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, DGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $39.6B |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -35.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and DGRO
Explore further