Screener
DIVZ vs PID
Polen Dividend Income ETF vs Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- PID costs 0.12% less per year.
- PID is significantly larger than DIVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVZ covers north america markets; PID covers global.
- DIVZ follows a active selection strategy; PID uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVZ | PID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $929M |
| Since | 2021 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.57% | 3.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | +12.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.19% | 9.72% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -46.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVZ and PID
Explore further